Select a State:

Judicial Selection in the States

News

The North Carolina Senate has voted to override the governor s veto of HB 100, a bill to take return the state s trial court...

Read More...

The Oklahoma House and Senate this week advanced bills to change the way the state s appellate courts in general, and their supreme court in...

Read More...

A plan to expand public information about Montana Supreme Court races has been filed in that state s House. First, some background. Montana uses a...

Read More...

In recent years, proposals have been introduced by legislators, governors, courts, and citizens' groups in nearly every state to limit the role of politics in the selection of state judges.

The extent of these activities underscores the recognition that an independent judiciary is essential to the maintenance of public trust and confidence in the court system.

The American Judicature Society, through funding from the Open Society Institute, has contributed to these efforts by compiling comprehensive information on judicial selection processes in each of the fifty states and the District of Columbia. Topics covered include methods of selecting, retaining, and removing of judges; successful and unsuccessful reform efforts; the roles of parties, interest groups, and professional organizations in selecting judges; and the diversity of the bench.

  • To view state-specific information, select a state from the drop-down menu in the upper right or from the map below.
  • To view practices among states, select a topic on the left.